Phoenix Rising: A Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)
Newsletter (March 2008)
Dr. Klimas on the Immune System,
Pathogens and a Hopeful Future By Cort Johnson
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) News
Make the Canadian Consensus Definition the Official Definition - Mary
Schweitzer has organized a petition to make the Canadian Consensus Document
(CCD) the official definition. While the CCD uses post-exertional fatigue and cognitive
problems to define chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) the latest CDC
definition throws in emotional distress, discounts fatigue and virtually
throws away post-exertional malaise. How would you rather be defined?
Please participate in this worthy effort.
A Remarkable Story - 'It was very much like being a dead person ... I
could only lie
there.' Read how a very severely ill person completely recovered from
chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Zoe
Cormier, The Globe & Mail, March 8, 2008
Prohealth News - Prohealth, the most active ME/CFS/FM website on the net,
has been busy as always. Check out their
●
ME/CFS Survey on how long people have been ill, how many doctors they've
seen etc.
●
Q&A
with Mind/Body FM/CFS researcher Dr. Collinge
● Excerpt on
Smell, Immunity and the Brain From A New Book on MCS by Dr. Donohue
● Rich Carson on the status of
the
Fair Name Change Campaign
● Excerpt on
How
Pain is Amplified in FM from Dr. Pelligrino's book
CFIDS Association Of America News - The CAA has been busy as well.
Their e-link newsletters have been particularly informative of late. Check
out their
Their latest e-link Newsletter for Kim McCleary's overview of the
Congressional Briefing, a Webinar on the Science of CFS with their new
Research Director, Dr. Vernon, and the first of their year-long series on
'The Science of Sleep' plus research news and more.
In a recent newsletter Dr. Vernon, the CAA's new research director, assessed the idea that a central
nervous system virus might cause ME/CFS in
'An Interesting
Hypothesis'.
Conference on the Viruses Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) -The Sixth
International Conference on HHV-6 will contain, for the first time, a
Satellite Conference devoted to Viruses in CFS.Dr. Montoya's Valcyte study results will be presented,
Dr. Chia will speak on Enteroviruses, Dr. Peterson on CFS and Cancer plus much more.
Location: Baltimore, Maryland USA - June 22nd-23rd, 2008,
Thanks to the help of the Florida ME/CFS Support Group PANDORA, the HHV-6 Foundation and my brother I will
be covering this conference.
Dr. Jason Talks With the NY Times
- We've been getting in the Times lately.
Here our foremost epidemiologist and one of our strongest advocates talks
with them.
The
California Lyme Disease Association has beautifully updated their
extensive
website.
RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
In the last newsletter we looked at a senior CDC CFS researcher’s conception
of chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Now we take advantage of a recent
paper, a
Prohealth chat
and
Name
Change Campaign Profile with Dr. Nancy Klimas,
professor, physician, researcher, and advocate for a review of the recent
immune findings, treatment options and what she believes the future looks
like for chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
First we’ll take a look at her paper and then at Dr.
Klimas’s Prohealth chat
and her
profile.
Nancy Klimas on the Immune and Neuroendocrine
Systems in ME/CFS: the Recent Findings
Nancy G. Klimas, MD, and Anne O'Brien Koneru, MSN, 2007. Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome: Inflammation, Immune Function, and Neuroendocrine Interactions.
Current Rheumatology Reports. Vol. 9, #6, pp 482-487
What’s up in the immune systems of ME/CFS patients? One thing that appears to be up is viral reactivation.
Viral Reactivation
Note that this section is not called ‘viral attack’ but
‘viral reactivation’ – a very different scenario. The first (viral attack)
suggests a pathogen has entered an otherwise healthy body and simply needs
to be destroyed. The chief problem there is finding, identifying and then
killing the pathogen – sometimes, as we shall see, a very difficult task. The
second problem (viral reactivation) suggests the immune system has been
weakened enough that latent (or inactive) viruses that humans carry dormant
within them have become ‘reactivated’. In the first case the pathogen is
primary; in the second immune dysfunction is. The second case appears to be
more common in chronic fatigue syndrome.
Dr. Klimas noted that a study employing several different methods of
assessing viral persistence found that 40% of chronic fatigue syndrome
(ME/CFS) patients had evidence of a herpesvirus infection. The Dubbo studies
found that CFS (post-viral fatigue) was a common outcome of a serious
infection. Dr. Chia also recently found a high persistence of enteroviral
infection in the gut.
A Look Forward
Shortly we’ll be presenting an interview with Dr. John Chia. He used a different technique (biopsy) to look in a different place
(gastrointestinal system) and found a different pathogen (enterovirus) in a
majority of ME/CFS patients. His research suggests ME/CFS patients may have
an undiagnosed chronic infection.
Dig Deeper: Check out HHV-6 in
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
It appears that viral reactivation occurs in at least some chronic fatigue
syndrome (ME/CFS) patients. Why might this be so? Dr. Klimas first outlines
evidence that the immune system (T-cells) is overly activated (probably
by a pathogen) but out of balance. She then spells out recent evidence suggesting ME/CFS patients have immune
system abnormalities that open holes in our lines of defense that pathogens
may be able to take advantage of. That's where we'll pick up the
discussion.
Hole #1 – Poor T-cell Activation
Recent studies by Dr. Maes, a Belgium researcher, suggest that ME/CFS
patients’ immune systems are not functioning properly. Dr. Maes, a
well-known researcher specializing in depression is a relative newcomer to
the chronic fatigue syndrome research field, but he’s made up ground fast;
he’s quickly become one of our most active researchers.
Dr. Maes has found evidence suggesting that the important pathogen killing
machines, T-cells, are having trouble activating themselves. This problem
appeared to be correlated with decreased levels of the antioxidant zinc, an
important T-cell co-factor. Low levels of antioxidants suggest that
increased oxidative (i.e. oxidant/free radicals) stress in ME/CFS patients
have damaged
their anti-oxidant systems.
Personal Note – Zinc is rarely discussed in connection with ME/CFS but zinc
solution was the first substance that I, after 10 years of no results from
anything, first reacted favorably to.
Where is this oxidative stress coming from? Much oxidative stress (free
radical damage) is a by-product of inflammation and the fatty acid
levels of Dr. Maes patients suggested increased inflammation was indeed present.
Where do these fatty acids come from? They appear to come from damaged
cellular
membranes.
Dr. Maes found evidence that the immune systems had mounted an attack
against these damaged bits of cellular membranes. The fact that the
degree of cellular damage was correlated with symptom severity suggested
oxidative stress is an important factor in this disease.
Dig Deeper: Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA’s) or
omega fatty acids show some promise in ME/CFS.
For more on PUFA's click here.
Dr. Klimas tied this together with viral activity by noting that some
researchers believe the membrane damage Maes found is caused by viral
activity. We started out with evidence of increased immune activation and Maes has
now outlined two immune stimulants: damaged bits of cellular membranes
that the immune system attacks and the viruses themselves.
We can start to build a scenario; viruses attack and damage cell
membranes releasing factors that increase immune activation and cause
further inflammation (i.e. oxidative stress). This increased oxidative
stress depletes the antioxidant system leading to reduced zinc levels,
which in turn impairs T-cell activation. Impaired T-cell activation
results in greater viral activity and the cycle continues
Dig Deeper: Dr’s. Chaudhuri and Behan believe that viral damage may be responsible for the choline peaks they see in
their brain imaging studies.
See “A Neurological Channelopathy In CFS?” for their findings.
Caution - very technical!
Conundrum: We have a conundrum, however. We started off stating T-cells were overly activated in ME/CFS
but Dr. Maes suggested that T-cell activation was impaired.
Hole #2: Natural Killer Cell Dysfunction
Next Dr. Klimas turned to one of the most interesting aspects of immune
research, natural killer cells. These cells, which man the front lines of
our defense, constantly probe cells to see if they are damaged or
infected. If they are they zap them with a substance called perforin
which drills small holes into them causing them to die off.
Many immune findings have let us down over time with their inconsistency.
Natural killer cell dysfunction has, however, stood the test of time – study
after study has shown that natural killer cells are functioning poorly in
CFS patients. Dr. Fletcher and Dr. Klimas have over the past 20 years slowly
dug deeper into the natural killer cell question in CFS. Their Miami group
reported last year that patients with more severe NK dysfunction tend to
be more severely ill - and possibly outlined the first immune subset in
this disease.
Since natural killer and cytotoxic T-cells – the heavy guns of the ‘acquired
immune defense’ defense – use the same machinery to kill infected cells,
Drs. Fletcher and Klimas took a look at T-cells as well. Their results
suggested that T-cell killing capacity was low as well. Thus it appears that
the primary virus killers in the both the early (innate) immune response
(natural killer cells) and the late immune response (acquired) (T-cells)
were performing poorly.
Dig Deeper:
More on Natural Killer Cells
in the Jan 2006 newsletter
Why is this happening? Remember the T-cell activation Dr. Klimas noted
earlier? The Fletcher/Klimas team has proposed that the poor NK and T-cell
performance seen is due to over activation; these cells are working too hard
and are essentially running out of ammunition.
Dr. Klimas focused on the treatment implications of low natural killer cell
activity. As we just noted recent work suggests that a subset of CFS patients with low NK
functioning are more severely ill. If a drug trial underway proves
successful it’s possible some relief for at least some of them may be on the
horizon. (See below).
One attempt at enhancing NK cell function with a known NK cell enhancer,
Biobran, however, failed to produce to results.
Hole #3 – Hormones and Women and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)
Dr. Klimas built the case for a hormonal component by noting that more women
than men suffer from autoimmune diseases - which are also thought to have
a hormonal component. She pointed to a small study suggesting that estrogen
abnormalities could be a reason for the female predominance in CFS. This
study suggested that estrogen was having a hard time binding to – and thus
interacting with – cells in female ME/CFS patients. Since estrogen has
anti-inflammatory effects, low estrogen activity could be contributing to
the inflammation/oxidative stress Dr. Maes just outlined in ME/CFS.
Focus on Estrogen and Hormones in ME/CFS
Estrogen therapy to treat menopausal symptoms was put into question when
studies revealed it increased the risk of breast cancer. Most physicians do
not test for estrogen levels in ME/CFS but some ME/CFS physicians make
hormonal testing a key aspect in their practice. Practitioners such as Dr. Teitelbaum, Dr. Holtorf and those
associated with the Fibro-Fatigue Centers claim that
bio-identical hormones do not have the negative effects traditional
hormone prescriptions do. Other physicians do not agree.
Click here
for Dr. Holtor's take on bio-identical hormones and the estrogen
question.
Dr. Klimas was a member of
the Pharmacogenomics efforts and she gave an overview of these
extraordinarily complex efforts. It was very satisfying to see these
exploratory studies substantiate themes advanced by CFS researchers
which had largely been ignored by the research community. They included
ion channel dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, heart rate
variability and sympathetic nervous system dysfunction. They also suggested ME/CFS patients have genetic
abnormalities that may predispose them to problems with the stress response.
Dig Deeper - See Overview's of the Pharmacogenomic's Studies
In the aftermath of the Pharmacogenomics studies the CDC focused on the
stress response, in particular the HPA axis. Here Dr. Klimas brings up an
interesting question. Immune problems don’t necessarily mean the immune
system itself is dysfunctional. Given the interconnections the immune system
has with other systems, the immune problems seen in chronic fatigue syndrome
(ME/CFS) could at least in part result from problems elsewhere.
Because cortisol is an immune suppressant, for instance, insufficient
cortisol levels could result in excessive immune activation and
inflammation. Dr. Klimas’s colleague, Dr. Fletcher, is currently
exploring whether the other major
stress response system - the sympathetic nervous system – is contributing to
NK cell problems ME/CFS?. Do the immune dysfunctions in ME/CFS start in the
immune system or elsewhere?
We started out with evidence of viral reactivation. Now we arrive at its
counterpoint: if chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients have problems with viral
reactivation/activation then antiviral trials should be successful.
Antiviral/Antibacterial Trials
Perhaps some researchers can explain away
isolated immune findings but it’s hard – very hard – to explain away
successful treatment trials and the best evidence that the immune system plays
an important role in ME/CFS comes from successful antiviral trials. Besides
the high rates of success of the better known Montoya and Lerner antiviral
trials Dr. Klimas pointed out how successful a (small) trial of the
immunomodulator azithromycin was; most patients achieved 80% of their former
functioning.
(While the patients were reported to regain 80% functioning we had to rely on
the author’s words for that; no measurements backed up that finding. This is
definitely a preliminary finding.)
The caveat with the antiviral trials is their selectivity; in order to
enter them chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients had to have levels
of infection that only a subset of patients may meet. Nevertheless the
results were startling. If the follow-up Montoya trial is successful one should
expect our federal agencies (CDC and NIH) to acknowledge the likelihood that
a chronic infection subset exists in ME/CFS and begin to fund research in
that area. Both the Lerner and Montoya trials are being funded by
pharmaceutical firms, the federal government having lost interest in this
area several years ago.
Dr. Hanna of the NIH has, in fact, recently expressed interest in re-opening the pathogen
question. The CDC largely dismissed Dr. Chia’s effort but it collaborated
with Dr. Montoya on his study.
Putting the Science to Work - Treating Chronic
Fatigue Syndrome: The Prohealth Chat
and Profile
Prohealth provides a great boon to the ME/CFS community with their
frequently chats and interviews with ME/CFS physicians and researchers.
“The
progress has been very significant in the past few years.
Learning about ME/CFS with the new tools we have available really will bring effective therapy."
Dr. Klimas, a member of the Name Change Campaign, recently appeared in a
ProHealth chat
and in a
Name Change
Campaign Profile. In her paper Dr. Klimas characterized several immune problems
that may face ME/CFS patients and she pointed to three potential treatment
pathways; targeted therapies to impact immune function, HPA axis activity,
and persistent viral reactivation in CFS patients. In the Prohealth articles
she talks about some of these treatments.
Not An Easy Situation Dr. Klimas’s
Chat on Prohealth.com demonstrated how
complex treating ME/CFS can be. (Since it was in response to audience
questions it does not present a full overview of her thoughts of this
subject.)
Dig Deeper -
Check out the Chat! There's lots
more to her chat than is featured in this newsletter
Pathogen identification Since, “when the immune system lets one virus out
it can let out many,” she believes identifying any pathogens present is
important. She noted that Epstein-Barr virus, the virus responsible for
infectious mononucleosis – a common trigger for post-viral fatigue/ chronic
fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) - is particularly tough on the immune system.
Immune System Boosters: Since the predominant pathogen problem in ME/CFS
appears to be viral reactivation one could assume the primary problem is an
immune dysfunction that allows latent pathogens to proliferate. Indeed Dr. Klimas’s statement “when the immune system lets one virus out...” suggests
that the core problem in CFS is poor immune performance. Later she will
observe that “immune boosting drugs may be very important” in treating this
disease.
But when asked if the immune system of a chronic fatigue syndrome patient
should be boosted or tamped down Dr. Klimas made it clear that the situation
is complex indeed stating “you want better antiviral function but less
inflammation and immune activation. That’s not easy and immune-based
therapies have to be careful not to immunosuppress.”
This suggests that immune activation is tricky in ME/CFS. Several
researchers are exploring neuro-endocrine-immune interactions in this
disease. Does treating ME/CFS require rebalancing several systems at once?
Dr. Klimas states the evidence suggests this illness ‘involves cellular
dysfunction and interactions between the physiologic stress response and
inflammation’. Her colleague Dr. Fletcher is exploring ways the sympathetic
and immune system are interacting in ME/CFS.
She went on to say that “every patient is different and immune system
problems could result from (and lead to) persistent viral reactivation or
could come from more of an autoimmune problem.”
A Tangled Web. A patient with an under performing immune system
would benefit from an immune booster. An immune booster might be the last
thing you’d want to give, however, someone with an already overactive immune
system (autoimmune problems). This is quite complex but this is CFS.
Obviously one solution to this problem is
identifying subsets and Dr. Klimas
noted that UK
physician/researcher Dr. Kerr is using gene expression studies
“Do you think we are close to cracking the cause of
ME/CFS?” “Yes I do (!)”.
to do just that. In a Prohealth interview with Karen Richards she stated
that gene expression studies “give
us the potential to subgroup people very accurately into physiologic
subgroups that would be potentially responsive to treatments which takes
away this mess we’ve had of lumping everyone together and then being
surprised when a therapeutic approach fails to pass clinical trials level
standards.” (i.e. they can use gene expression tests to target specific
therapies to specific types of ME/CFS patients). Thus far Dr. Kerr has
identified seven subsets, two of which he appears to be treating with immune
drugs.
Subset # 1. Dr. Kerr has identified a subset of ME/CFS patients with
over-active immune systems. These patients appear to have increased
production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha
(TNF-a). He’s treating them with the drug Etanercept to turn down their
TNF-a levels.
Dr. Kerr believes the problem in this particular set of patients is not a
pathogen – it is immune dysfunction. He believes their immune systems are
turned on when they shouldn’t be. Since this approach requires turning the
immune response down it cannot be used in patients with active infections;
these patients are presumably pathogen free.
Dig Deeper: Etanercept in ME/CFS
Subset #2. Dr. Kerr is using an immune booster (interferon-b) on another
subset of patients who presumably have pathogen problems. Because
interferon-B is able, among other things, to increase natural killer cell
activity, it could assist ME/CFS patients who have low NK cell activity. Interferon-B is a strong drug that can (in the wrong kind of
patient) cause the same symptoms found in chronic fatigue syndrome. It’s
unclear how big this subset of patients is.
Dig Deeper: Interferon-B in ME/CFS
A Breakthrough Technology for ME/CFS? - When asked “Do you think we are
close to cracking the cause of ME/CFS?” she stated “Yes I do (!)”. Where
will these breakthroughs come from? Perhaps not surprisingly given Dr.
Kerr’s and her own work she believes gene expression studies hold the key.
She states these studies have given researchers “amazing insight(s)” into
chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).
Gene expression studies illustrate the genetic activity going on in the body
right now. Genetic studies, on the other hand, illustrate the genetic
endowment each of us is born with.
The Holy Grail: A Biomarker She also believes gene expression technology
will give us another holy grail in chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS);
diagnostic biomarkers. She noted that this work is already far enough along
that a company in Boston is trying to move it through the FDA.
Recovery??? - When asked if people recover from ME/CFS she stated
“Absolutely! And complete resolution. It happens but not often enough to
make promises.”
When asked if people recover from ME/CFS she stated “Absolutely!
And complete resolution. It happens but not often enough to make promises.”
The best advice Dr. Klimas could give, interestingly enough though, at least
on surface, had nothing to do with the immune system. It involved what Dr.
Friedbergs calls ‘lifestyle management’. She says “Number one is hope – just
the word hope. The progress has been very significant in the past few years.
We’ve really made big gains. Learning about ME/CFS with the new tools we
have available really will bring effective therapy. Number two is pace
yourself. It’s the single best thing anyone can learn to do.”
Pacing may not seem to be related to immune problems but a team of Dutch
researchers recently released a theory paper suggesting how they might
be related.
"Pace yourself. It’s the
single best thing anyone can learn to do.”
They propose that chronic activation of the stress response system
causes it to ‘switch’ to a dysfunctional state.When ME/CFS patients overdo it, i.e. do
not pace themselves these researchers believe they activate that
dysfunctional stress response system and that causes their
symptoms.
(Van Houdenhove, B. et. al. 2007. Rehabilitation
of motor performance in chronic fatigue syndrome: should we treat low effort
capacity or reduced effort tolerance. Clinical Rehabilitation 1121-1142)
Thus stressing the stress response by stepping outside of ones ‘energy
envelope’ exacerbates the immune and other problems already present.